No. 14
February 6, 1998
THE CANADIAN HUMAN
RIGHTS TRIBUNAL
During 1997 the PSAC attempted to obtain a settlement of the
federal pay equity complaint for our members. Unfortunately, the
government spent more time making threats and walking away from
the table than negotiating in good faith. In 1998, our union will
continue pursuing the goal of a negotiated settlement within the
provisions of the Canadian Human Rights Act. If the government
does not cooperate, the federal pay equity complaint will finally
be resolved through a decision of the Canadian Human Rights
Tribunal established to hear our complaint. This bulletin
provides some information about the Tribunal and what Alliance
members can expect from it.
What is the
tribunal?
A Human Rights
Tribunal is independent from the Canadian Human Rights
Commission(CHRC). It is a panel of three people who act like
judges to interpret the Canadian Human Rights Act. They hear
evidence and arguments based on fact and the law and they make
rulings. The three members on the PSAC/CHRC versus the Treasury
Board Tribunal - one man and two women - were chosen by the
President of the Human Rights Tribunal from a list of names put
forward by the party in power at the time of their appointment.
They are from different regions of the country and have different
backgrounds.
Tribunal
Decisions to date
The Tribunal has
already ruled in PSAC's favour several times. Their most
encouraging decision came out in 1996 when they ruled that the
results of the joint equal pay study (1985-89) were reliable and
could be used to calculate "the existence or otherwise of a
wage gap between male and female employees employed in the same
establishment".
Tribunal Decisions to come
From spring 1996 to January 1997, the parties made arguments and are now waiting for a decision on the following:
When can we
expect that decision?
The PSAC has recently
received a letter from the Registrar of the Human Rights Tribunal
which said we could not expect a decision before the end of
March, 1998. We are hopeful it will not be too much longer after
that but we know the length and complexity of the case makes it a
complicated decision to write.
What is the
impact of the Tribunal Decision?
Contrary to Marcel
Massé's statements about another set of hearings, the Tribunal's
decision is binding. It can only be appealed by either party
within 30 days if there is an error in fact or in law. In other
words, the government can't appeal the decision simply because it
doesn't like it. If there is no error in fact or in law in the
Tribunal's decision there can be no appeal. An appeal would be
heard by the Federal Court (Trial Division). If the appeal gets
past this stage it could be referred to the Federal Court (Appeal
Division) and perhaps even the Supreme Court of Canada. However,
the Supreme Court does not always grant leave to appeal. And,
only those parts of the decision which are in error would be
argued.
Even if the PSAC or
the Treasury Board think there are good reasons to appeal the
decision, whatever monies the Tribunal has decided should be paid
to PSAC members will have to be paid. The appeal process does not
stop the Tribunal's decision from being applied unless the
government can convince the courts otherwise. Again, a court will
not agree to stop any payments just because the government
doesn't agree with or like the Tribunal's decision.
The end is in sight - sooner rather than later
The pressure PSAC
members have put on their Members of Parliament has brought them
closer to a positive solution than at any time in the past.
PSAC has received a large degree of support from the media and the general public for its position. PSAC is part of a national "Fair Wages/Pay Equity" campaign with the Canadian Labour Congress and the National Action Committee on the Status of Women. Questions from the New Democratic Party and the Bloc Quebecois continue to maintain a high profile for this issue in the House of Commons. One year ago none of this was the reality. Thanks to the commitment, energy, creativity and, most importantly, solidarity of PSAC members, this issue is coming to its rightful conclusion.